Re: [PATCH] ata_sg_setup_one vs ata_sg_setup?

[Tejun Heo]

Rusty Russell wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> 
>     Was looking through libata, and it seems to me that ata_sg_setup is a
> superset of ata_sg_setup_one.  Am I missing something?  Seems like it could
> be simplified.
> 
> My machine never seems to do an ata_sg_setup_one, so this patch isn't really
> tested...

I have about the same patch queued here which also kills
ata_sg_init_one() completely and replaces
ATA_QCFLAG_SG/ATA_QCFLAG_SINGLE with ATA_QCFLAG_DMAMAP (now a single
flag).  I'll compare your version and mine and see if mine is missing
something.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/