Re: [PATCH] bw-qcam: adds parameter aggressive to skip passive detection and directly attempt initialization

From: Brett Warden
Date: Wed Dec 05 2007 - 13:31:26 EST

Next message: Oleg Nesterov: "[PATCH -mm] sys_setsid: remove now unneeded session != 1 check"
Previous message: Denis Cheng: "[PATCH] drivers/base: use LIST_HEAD instead of call to INIT_LIST_HEAD in __init"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] bw-qcam: adds parameter aggressive to skip passivedetection and directly attempt initialization"
Next in thread: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [PATCH] bw-qcam: adds parameter aggressive to skip passive detectionand directly attempt initialization"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Dec 5, 2007 9:37 AM, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Although I would suggest that "aggressive" may not be the best term - I'm
> not such of a good one however - skip_passive ?

How about force_init?

--
Brett Warden
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Oleg Nesterov: "[PATCH -mm] sys_setsid: remove now unneeded session != 1 check"
Previous message: Denis Cheng: "[PATCH] drivers/base: use LIST_HEAD instead of call to INIT_LIST_HEAD in __init"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] bw-qcam: adds parameter aggressive to skip passivedetection and directly attempt initialization"
Next in thread: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [PATCH] bw-qcam: adds parameter aggressive to skip passive detectionand directly attempt initialization"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]