Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4

[Jie Chen]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jie Chen <chen@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I just disabled the affinity mask and reran the test. There were no 
> > significant changes for two threads (barrier overhead is around 9 
> > microseconds). As for 8 threads, the barrier overhead actually drops a 
> > little, which is good. Let me know whether I can be any help. Thank 
> > you very much.
>
> sorry to be dense, but could you give me instructions how i could remove 
> the affinity mask and test the "barrier overhead" myself? I have built 
> "pthread_sync" and it outputs numbers for me - which one would be the 
> barrier overhead: Reference_time_1 ?
>
> 	Ingo
Hi, Ingo:

To disable affinity, do configure --enable-public-release 
--disable-thread_affinity. You should see barrier overhead like the 
following:
Computing BARRIER time

Sample_size  Average     Min    Max          S.D.        Outliers
 20      19.486162   19.482250   19.491400    0.002740      0

BARRIER time =        19.486162 microseconds +/- 0.005371
BARRIER overhead =    8.996257 microseconds +/- 0.006575

The Reference_time_1 is the elapsed time for single thread doing simple 
loop without any synchronization. Thank you.

--
###############################################
Jie Chen
Scientific Computing Group
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
12000, Jefferson Ave.
Newport News, VA 23606

(757)269-5046 (office) (757)269-6248 (fax)
chen@xxxxxxxx
###############################################

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/