Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

[Tejun Heo]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> If any machines _are_ breaking then this could cause real problems
>>> and I'd prefer that we either go for a whitelist or arrange to
>>> detect the condition and fall back to non-acpi ata.
>> The pending patchset should make ATA ACPI quite resistant to failures.
> 
> Are you going to push it for 2.6.24?

Yeah, I'm hoping so.  Maybe command filtering should wait till 2.6.25
but the rest, yeap.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/