Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64with MCP51 laptops

From: Alan Cox
Date: Mon Dec 10 2007 - 07:09:01 EST


> Really?
>
> udelay() seems to use
> ... cpu_data(raw_smp_processor_id()).loops_per_jiffy ..

Ok that should be a good safety
>
> ..so it seems that bug trap is already there... because
> raw_smp_processor_id() will probably just oops...

And I double checked my docs - they say 8 cycles - 1uS

Incidentally some of the drivers seem buggy for SMP. The bus locking
nature of the inb_p probably hid this but they don't all seem to have
sufficient locking to ensure that we don't get back to back cycles
without delays

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/