Re: [RFC] net: napi fix

[David Miller]

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:35:07 -0800

> How about allowing a return value of -1 from napi_poll and letting
> device check itself.

It doesn't avoid the code duplication in the ->poll() fast paths.

I don't care, on the other hand, if crap accumulates in non-critical
slow paths like napi_disable() and dev_close().  That's why I'm
suggesting solutions in that area.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/