Re: [PATCH] avoid ifdefs in desc.h, getting rid of pack_ldt and pack_tss

[Glauber de Oliveira Costa]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Well, "no functional changes" is not quite the same thing as "no 
> > > object code changes".
> >
> > yeah, true, but the safest way to ensure no functional changes is to 
> > get identical object code. In sched-devel.git i include obj 
> > comparisons to cleanup patches as a self-assurance (and later bughunt 
> > helper) to make sure a cleanup is really just a cleanup.
>
> Of course.  "No object code changes" is a stronger statement, however, 
> not all types of cleanups result in that.
Which is the case here. I wasn't expecting the same object code. Anyway, 
the mistake is explained, and I'm about to send the correct version. 
Sorry again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/