Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)

[Richard Harman]

Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:57:59 -0500
> Richard Harman <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I think I may have a monkey wrench to throw into this, I finally got 
> > around to testing the C1E patch, and the port80 patch.  End result: 
> > port80 patch has zero effect on this laptop, and the C1E patch makes
> > it stable.
> >
> > AMD C1E patch 'force_amd_c1e' (disabling the workaround):
> >
> > hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 31
> > hpet0: 3 32-bit timers, 25000000 Hz
> > Time: hpet clocksource has been installed.
> > Clockevents: could not switch to one-shot mode: lapic is not
> > functional. Could not switch to high resolution mode on CPU 0
> > Clockevents: could not switch to one-shot mode: lapic is not
> > functional. Could not switch to high resolution mode on CPU 1
> >
> > And with the C1E workaround enabled, the kernel doesn't whine that
> > the lapic isn't functional.
> >
> > Those were the kernel messages I was trying to paste in my earlier 
> > message, saying that the lapic works.  Do I have a DV6000 laptop that
> > is a strange beast all in itself?
>
> These two patches are not related in any way, they address two
> different problems. My patch enables dynticks (and those messages don't
> show up anymore), but it doesn't prevent your computer from locking up
> as you said before.

The C1E patch, which permits the lapic to function *does* make my system 
stable.  My previous method of testing (using USB peripherals) and 
checking /proc/interrupts for ERRor interrupts so far hasn't caused the 
system to lock up.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/