Re: [PATCH 00 of 10] x86: unify asm/pgtable.h

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> threw this into the random test setup: it found the attached config 
> after a few iterations, which needed the fix below. (config builds and 
> boots fine with this fix)
>
> the problem was that set_pud() is used by 
> include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopud.h, to build set_pgd():
>
> #define set_pgd(pgdptr, pgdval)                 set_pud((pud_t *)(pgdptr), (pud_t) { pgdval })
>   

Oh, yeah.  That's bitten me before, but I guess I lost that part of the 
patch somewhere :(.

> it's truly a maze ... took me 10 straight minutes of staring at the code 
> to figure out where the set_pud() came from :-/
>   

It's pretty awful.  The pagetable level folding stuff is fairly deep 
into "too clever" territory, but its hard to see what better 
alternatives there are...  Dropping non-PAE support would be nice, but 
impractical given that even relatively recent chips are missing support 
for it.

> anyway, your patchset is holding up pretty good so far in testing.
>   

Great!

   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/