Re: The ext3 way of journalling

From: Matthias Schniedermeyer
Date: Sat Jan 12 2008 - 05:09:01 EST


On 12.01.2008 18:10, TimC wrote:
> Bodo Eggert <7eggert@xxxxxx> said on Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:41:17 +0100 (CET):
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:22:45PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> >
> > > > What can happen if someone does tune2fs -Lroot /dev/usbstick
> > > > and puts that stick into this system?
> > >
> > > Don't know. I use UUIDs rather than LABELs. Having duplicated labels
> > > just means being careless. Having duplicate UUIDs should require being
> > > malicous.
> >
> > That's exactly what you have to assume for your users. Otherwise, you could
> > remove any security feature from the system.
>
> If they've got physical access to your machine, you've already lost.

As a last resort there is always the option to encrypt everything.

Of course you loose the LABEL & UUID support with that.

But i circumvented that by a custom udev script and marking the MBR in
the documented 4 bytes for an ID that is used by said script to create
an appropriate symlink.

Together with a matching autofs-conf i can still automatically mount all
my >50 encrypted HDDs i have stacked on my shelf. :-)






Bis denn

--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated,
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/