Re: [PATCH 001 of 6] md: Fix an occasional deadlock in raid5

From: dean gaudet
Date: Wed Jan 16 2008 - 00:01:31 EST


On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, NeilBrown wrote:

>
> raid5's 'make_request' function calls generic_make_request on
> underlying devices and if we run out of stripe heads, it could end up
> waiting for one of those requests to complete.
> This is bad as recursive calls to generic_make_request go on a queue
> and are not even attempted until make_request completes.
>
> So: don't make any generic_make_request calls in raid5 make_request
> until all waiting has been done. We do this by simply setting
> STRIPE_HANDLE instead of calling handle_stripe().
>
> If we need more stripe_heads, raid5d will get called to process the
> pending stripe_heads which will call generic_make_request from a
> different thread where no deadlock will happen.
>
>
> This change by itself causes a performance hit. So add a change so
> that raid5_activate_delayed is only called at unplug time, never in
> raid5. This seems to bring back the performance numbers. Calling it
> in raid5d was sometimes too soon...
>
> Cc: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>

probably doesn't matter, but for the record:

Tested-by: dean gaudet <dean@xxxxxxxxxx>

this time i tested with internal and external bitmaps and it survived 8h
and 14h resp. under the parallel tar workload i used to reproduce the
hang.

btw this should probably be a candidate for 2.6.22 and .23 stable.

thanks
-dean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/