Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incrementalfsck)

[Alan Cox]

> And I think there's a problem with drives that, upon sensing the 
> unreadable sector, assign an alternate even though the sector is fine, and 
> you eventually run out of spares.

You are assuming drives can't tell the difference between stray data loss
and sectors that can't be recovered by rewriting and reuse. I was under
the impression modern drives could do this ?

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/