Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core

[Matthew Garrett]

On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:06:02PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:

> Aren't you forgetting about CPUfreq governors? Which mean: use the 
> maximum CPU frequency when the system is busy, throttle down (or lower 
> voltage) when the system is idle.
> 
> So yes, throttling will save the battery.
> 
> Besides, not all CPUs support power management (voltage control).

Voltage scaling isn't the only component of CPU power management. Intels 
have supported low power states on idle since the Pentium 90 (Cyrix had 
"Suspend on HALT" earlier than that), which means that an idle processor 
takes less power than one executing code. On anything even vaguely 
modern, throttling will not save you any significant power compared to 
the C state support.

> For example, a server that doesn't crunch any numbers at night will 
> certainly use less power when throttled.

Have you got benchmark figures for this?
-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/