Re: [PATCH 13/30] ocfs2: Implement group add for online resize

From: Mark Fasheh
Date: Wed Jan 23 2008 - 21:49:15 EST


On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 02:05:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:35:39 -0800 Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Tao Ma <tao.ma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch adds the ability for a userspace program to request that a
> > properly formatted cluster group be added to the main allocation bitmap for
> > an Ocfs2 file system. The request is made via an ioctl, OCFS2_IOC_GROUP_ADD.
> > On a high level, this is similar to ext3, but we use a different ioctl as
> > the structure which has to be passed through is different.
> >
> > During an online resize, tunefs.ocfs2 will format any new cluster groups
> > which must be added to complete the resize, and call OCFS2_IOC_GROUP_ADD on
> > each one. Kernel verifies that the core cluster group information is valid
> > and then does the work of linking it into the global allocation bitmap.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +/* Used to pass group descriptor data when online resize is done */
> > +struct ocfs2_new_group_input {
> > + __u64 group; /* Group descriptor's blkno. */
> > + __u32 clusters; /* Total number of clusters in this group */
> > + __u32 frees; /* Total free clusters in this group */
> > + __u16 chain; /* Chain for this group */
> > + __u16 reserved1;
> > + __u32 reserved2;
> > +};
>
> Are we sure that all architectures will lay this out in the same way with
> both 32-bit and 64-bit userspace?

I looked it over several times and haven't been able to find a problem -
everything is aligned at 8 byte boundaries. Do you see anything that might
be problematic?


> > +/* Add a new group descriptor to global_bitmap. */
> > +int ocfs2_group_add(struct inode *inode, struct ocfs2_new_group_input *input)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + handle_t *handle;
> > + struct buffer_head *main_bm_bh = NULL;
> > + struct inode *main_bm_inode = NULL;
> > + struct ocfs2_dinode *fe = NULL;
> > + struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
> > + struct buffer_head *group_bh = NULL;
> > + struct ocfs2_group_desc *group = NULL;
> > + struct ocfs2_chain_list *cl;
> > + struct ocfs2_chain_rec *cr;
> > + u16 cl_bpc;
> > +
> > + mlog_entry_void();
> > +
> > + if (ocfs2_is_hard_readonly(osb) || ocfs2_is_soft_readonly(osb))
> > + return -EROFS;
> > +
> > + main_bm_inode = ocfs2_get_system_file_inode(osb,
> > + GLOBAL_BITMAP_SYSTEM_INODE,
> > + OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT);
> > + if (!main_bm_inode) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + mlog_errno(ret);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&main_bm_inode->i_mutex);
> > +
> > + ret = ocfs2_inode_lock(main_bm_inode, &main_bm_bh, 1);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + mlog_errno(ret);
> > + goto out_mutex;
> > + }
> > +
> > + fe = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)main_bm_bh->b_data;
> > +
> > + if (le16_to_cpu(fe->id2.i_chain.cl_cpg) !=
> > + ocfs2_group_bitmap_size(osb->sb) * 8) {
> > + mlog(ML_ERROR, "The disk is too old and small."
> > + " Force to do offline resize.");
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = ocfs2_read_block(osb, input->group, &group_bh, 0, NULL);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + mlog(ML_ERROR, "Can't read the group descriptor # %llu "
> > + "from the device.", input->group);
> > + goto out;
>
> Bug: goto wrong_place. (Points at fault-injection code)

Ooof, good catch - thanks. A fix for this is attached to this e-mail, and
of course will be in ocfs2.git.


> > + }
> > +
> > + ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate(inode, group_bh);
> > +
> > + ret = ocfs2_verify_group_and_input(main_bm_inode, fe, input, group_bh);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + mlog_errno(ret);
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > + mlog(0, "Add a new group %llu in chain = %u, length = %u\n",
> > + input->group, input->chain, input->clusters);
> > +
> > + handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, OCFS2_GROUP_ADD_CREDITS);
> > + if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
> > + mlog_errno(PTR_ERR(handle));
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > + cl_bpc = le16_to_cpu(fe->id2.i_chain.cl_bpc);
> > + cl = &fe->id2.i_chain;
> > + cr = &cl->cl_recs[input->chain];
> > +
> > + ret = ocfs2_journal_access(handle, main_bm_inode, group_bh,
> > + OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + mlog_errno(ret);
> > + goto out_commit;
> > + }
> > +
> > + group = (struct ocfs2_group_desc *)group_bh->b_data;
> > + group->bg_next_group = cr->c_blkno;
> > +
> > + ret = ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, group_bh);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + mlog_errno(ret);
> > + goto out_commit;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = ocfs2_journal_access(handle, main_bm_inode, main_bm_bh,
> > + OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
>
> hm. Do we need to do that again?

I think you're missing that those are two different buffers :)


> > + spin_lock(&OCFS2_I(main_bm_inode)->ip_lock);
> > + OCFS2_I(main_bm_inode)->ip_clusters = le32_to_cpu(fe->i_clusters);
> > + le64_add_cpu(&fe->i_size, input->clusters << osb->s_clustersize_bits);
> > + spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(main_bm_inode)->ip_lock);
> > + i_size_write(main_bm_inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size));
>
> Is i_mutex held?

Yes.
--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Principal Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx


From: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx>

ocfs2: fix goto error in ocfs2_group_add()

We were jumping to the wrong label on read error which would have caused us
to exit the function with locks held.

Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ocfs2/resize.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
index a103698..261dabf 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ int ocfs2_group_add(struct inode *inode, struct ocfs2_new_group_input *input)
if (ret < 0) {
mlog(ML_ERROR, "Can't read the group descriptor # %llu "
"from the device.", (unsigned long long)input->group);
- goto out;
+ goto out_unlock;
}

ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate(inode, group_bh);
--
1.5.3.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/