Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test

[Ingo Molnar]

* Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:

> > It would have been easier to just use the public interface and 
> > hard-wire "rtc0".  But going directly to the hardware was dirtier, 
> > and more in the spirit of "hack that obviously shouldn't go upstream 
> > until it gets done properly".
> 
> Yes, it was "quick and dirty". And I do not think it is going upstream 
> in this form...?

which would be a pity - this thing _almost_ started doing suspend and 
resume cycles on my testsystems, all by itself :-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/