Re: [PATCH 0/6] udf: next round of cleanups

[Jan Kara]

On Sun 03-02-08 19:33:45, marcin.slusarz@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi
> 
> This patchset contains next round of various UDF fs cleanups.
> 
> [PATCH 1/6] udf: udf_get_block, inode_bmap - remove unneeded checks
> 
> [PATCH 2/6] udf: create function for conversion from timestamp to timespec
> [PATCH 3/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time to return struct timespec
> [PATCH 4/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time and udf_time_to_stamp to use timestamps
> [PATCH 5/6] udf: remove unneeded kernel_timestamp type
> These 4 patches can be folded into one if requested, but I think it's
> easier to analyze them when they are split.
> 
> [PATCH 6/6] udf: super.c reorganization
> Pretty mechanical work. Can be dropped and redone if it will
> conflict with someone else patch.
> 
>  fs/udf/ecma_167.h |   13 -
>  fs/udf/inode.c    |  183 ++++++-----------
>  fs/udf/super.c    |  553 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  fs/udf/udfdecl.h  |    8 
>  fs/udf/udfend.h   |   22 --
>  fs/udf/udftime.c  |   39 +--
>  6 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 460 deletions(-)
> 
> Applies on top of patches I've sent lately (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/30/482)
> 
> Jan: Are you going to create git tree for udf?
  I was already thinking about it to take some burden from Andrew. So if
you think you are going to have more time for these cleanups then I can
setup one (it would be useless when I send to Andrew one fix per month ;)...

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/