Re: blackfin compile error

From: Bryan Wu
Date: Thu Feb 07 2008 - 02:26:40 EST


On Feb 7, 2008 3:37 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:12:50 -0500
> Robin Getz <rgetz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Wed 6 Feb 2008 11:23, Matt Mackall pondered:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 17:18 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > Commit 698dd4ba6b12e34e1e432c944c01478c0b2cd773 broke blackfin:
> > > >
> > > > <-- snip -->
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > > CC mm/vmscan.o
> > > > In file included from
> > > > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/mm/vmscan.c:44:
> > > > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/swapops.h: In function 'is_swap_pte':
> > > > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/swapops.h:48: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_none'
> > > > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/swapops.h:48: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_present'
> > > > make[2]: *** [mm/vmscan.o] Error 1
> > >
> > > This suggests that no one's tried to compile -mm on Blackfin since
> > > before September, I think.
> >
> > Or any other nommu arch's either, since looking at the include files, FRV
> > (when configured as noMMU) and m68knommu does not include it either...
>
> sh is the only nommu arch which I test-compile for.
>
> The world would be a better place if arch maintainers (or their helpers)
> were to build and test -mm once a month or so.
>

I will be here for Blackfin. Actually, we got some patches in -mm, it
is necessary to built and test -mm on Blackfin.

Thanks
-Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/