Re: scsi/arm/fas216.c compile error

From: Russell King
Date: Sun Feb 10 2008 - 08:53:45 EST


On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09 2008 at 2:04 +0200, Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Commit 30b0c37b27485a9cb897bfe3824f6f517b8c80d6 causes the following
> > compile error:
> >
> > <-- snip -->
> >
> > ...
> > CC drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.o
> > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function 'fas216_std_done':
> > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:2120: error: 'struct scsi_cmnd' has no member named 'request_bufflen'
> > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:2122: error: 'struct scsi_cmnd' has no member named 'use_sg'
> > make[4]: *** [drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.o] Error 1
> >
> > <-- snip -->
> >
> > cu
> > Adrian
> >
> It's in mainline 84ac86ca8c6787f9efff28bc04b1b65fe0a5c310
> [SCSI] arm: convert to accessors and !use_sg cleanup
>
> Thanks for checking. This patch was in scsi-pending tree since forever, And we were unable
> to get a responsive maintainer to ACK on them. until the breakage cause went into mainline
> we finally managed a Tested-by:.
>
> I guess sometimes people are so busy, you need a bulldozer to shove 20 minutes into they're
> schedule.

Oh, just 20 minutes in your opinion? Reality works at a different tick
rate to your timing then.

However, if you're seeing a bulid error, it means that the *WRONG* patch
went in. No idea why I even bothered to test it if that's what happens.

--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/