Re: Status of storage autosuspend

[Alan Stern]

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:

> > Should we ignore this issue and submit the patches anyway?
> 
> I think you should. "Easy" (and clean) solution to that issue is to
> just return -EPERM from SG_IOCTL if autosuspend is configured in ;-).

:-)

Okay, I'll update the patches to 2.6.25-rc2 and submit them in a few
days.  (Actually the SCSI patch has to go in first and the usb-storage
patch afterward, which will probably cause it to be delayed one kernel
version.  I don't know any good way to handle these cross-subsystem
updates...)

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/