Re: atmel_spi clock polarity

[Atsushi Nemoto]

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:34:46 +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In that case, I think the best fix is to let NPCS0 stay selected
> permanently in MR and overwrite CSR0 with to the new slave's settings
> before asserting CS. But that's a more complicated change, and I don't
> know how it will affect the AT91RM9200 special cases.
> 
> So I suggest we merge your patch for 2.6.25, and try to optimize it
> for 2.6.26.

I absolutely agree.

> David, do you want me to pass on the patch with my signoff or just ask
> Andrew to add my Acked-by to the patch already in mm?

The patch in mm also lacks my Signed-off line.  I had thought Andrew
never take a patch without Signed-off line ;)

Should I resend my patch with my Signed-off and Haavard's Acked-by?

---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/