Re: [PATCH 11/12] Generic semaphore implementation

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 06:10:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Most of the conflicts will be due to all the
> 
> -#include <asm/semaphore.h>
> +#include <linux/semaphore.h>
> 
> but they're all optional anyway, because include/asm-*/semaphore.h is
> 
> #include <linux/semaphore.h>
> 
> so either a) you just ignore all those conflicts or b) we ask Willy to
> remove all that stuff and we can trickle it in via subsystems later.

Yeah, we can trickle that in later.  Fine by me.

I think rather more conflict is likely with the 105 files where I just
removed the asm/semaphore.h include.  I'd like it if we could get Linus
to merge those at this stage.  Since it passes an x86 allmodconfig
build, I'd like to think the breakage would be minimal.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/