Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation

[Max Krasnyanskiy]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > It of course lays waste to a series of cgroup patches from Paul Menage 
> > which I already had queued.
>
> Andrew, please stop tracking sched-devel.git and track this tree 
> instead:
>
>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git

Another option is to have cpusets or cpu isolation tree that I've started 
already. I was saying from the very beginning cpu isolation stuff does not 
imho belong in the scheduler tree. Besides a tiny patch to the sched.c that 
adds/removes the bitmaps there are no scheduler changes needed for this 
specifically.

Peter, Ingo, if you guys are ok with this lets just have this stuff in 
cpuisol-2.6.git. I'm anyway rebasing it ontop of Peter's work. Of course we'll 
go through regular review and stuff and Andrew can track that tree separately.

Just a suggestion. I'm ok with submitting patches via sched-devel. Separate 
tree seems more appropriate though.

Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/