Re: [PATCH] mmu notifiers #v8

[Nick Piggin]

On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 04:54:57PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Difference between #v7 and #v8:

This one on top of the previous patch

[patch] mmu-v8: typesafe

Move definition of struct mmu_notifier and struct mmu_notifier_ops under
CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER to ensure they doesn't get dereferenced when they
don't make sense.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
---
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
@@ -3,8 +3,12 @@
 
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/mm_types.h>
 
 struct mmu_notifier;
+struct mmu_notifier_ops;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
 
 struct mmu_notifier_ops {
 	/*
@@ -53,10 +57,6 @@ struct mmu_notifier {
 	const struct mmu_notifier_ops *ops;
 };
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
-
-#include <linux/mm_types.h>
-
 static inline int mm_has_notifiers(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	return unlikely(!hlist_empty(&mm->mmu_notifier_list));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/