Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add C99-style constructor macros for specific-sizedintegers

[H. Peter Anvin]

Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:43:22PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > > +#define S64_C(x) x ## LL
> > > > +#define U64_C(x) x ## ULL
> > > but can't we use the latter for all arches?
> > You really don't want to, as the whole point is that you want it to 
> > match what u64/s64 is defined as, in order to avoid spurious warnings.
>
> Excuse me, in which contexts?  Where does replacement of explicitly long
> constant with explicitly long long one generate warnings on a host that has
> range(long) equal to range(long long)?

printf, for example.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/