Re: early_res and find_e820_area for i386?

[Ingo Molnar]

* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> BTW: Why not merge e820_32.c and e820_64.c? At least part of them.
>
> What we *should* do, on both i386 and x86-64, is to create a synthetic 
> e820 table of any non-e820 information, and then yes, we should merge 
> the code.
>
> In other words, we should have an e820 table which reflects what the 
> kernel considers true about the memory space.

i'd strongly support the moving of this from the realm of talk into the 
realm of code! :-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/