On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:33:15 +0400
Manu Abraham <manu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Michael Krufky wrote:Manu Abraham wrote:I hope to do so, unless there aren't any significant issues. The multiproto tree is atMichael Krufky wrote:Manu,On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Harvey HarrisonPlease make sure your changes don't conflict with the multiproto tree
<harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
__FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__If we apply this, can it be broken down into several smaller patches?
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
162 files changed, 892 insertions(+), 892 deletions(-)
I am in the midst of a large overhaul of the tuning subsystem, and if
this all gets applied at once, it will wreck havoc on my pending
changesets.
changes.
Regards,
Manu
Does that mean that you plan to merge multiproto soon? If that's the
http://jusst.de/hg/multiproto.
(There's hell a lot of reviewing and testing going on by the testers on the linux-dvb
ML, but you might additionally like to check whether any of your devices have any
side effects)
Maybe the better would be if we merge from multiproto. Then, Harvey can safely
generate the __FUNCTION__ changesets.
Manu,
Can I merge it?