Re: [PATCH 0/2] Cpuset hardwall flag: Introduction

From: Paul Jackson
Date: Wed Mar 05 2008 - 07:23:35 EST


Paul M wrote:
> Currently the cpusets mem_exclusive flag is overloaded to mean both
> "no-overlapping" and "no GFP_KERNEL allocations outside this cpuset".
>
> These patches add a new mem_hardwall flag with just the allocation
> restriction part of the mem_exclusive semantics, without breaking
> backwards-compatibility for those who continue to use just
> mem_exclusive.

... too bad this nice comment wasn't included in PATCH 2/2, so that
it would automatically make it into the record of history - the source
control log message (as best I understand how Andrew's tools work,
comments off in their own, codeless patch "PATCH 0/N" don't make
it to the source control log, except when Andrew chooses to make a
special effort.)

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/