[PATCH -mm 2/2] send_sigqueue: don't forget about handle_stop_signal()

[Oleg Nesterov]

(on top of Pavel's signals-consolidate-send_sigqueue-and-send_group_sigqueue.patch)

send_group_sigqueue() calls handle_stop_signal(), send_sigqueue() doesn't.
This is not consistent and in fact I'd say this is (minor) bug.

Move handle_stop_signal() from send_group_sigqueue() to do_send_sigqueue(),
the latter is called by send_sigqueue() too.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- 25/kernel/signal.c~2_SS_HSS	2008-03-06 00:35:35.000000000 +0300
+++ 25/kernel/signal.c	2008-03-06 00:43:50.000000000 +0300
@@ -1274,8 +1274,10 @@ void sigqueue_free(struct sigqueue *q)
 }
 
 static int do_send_sigqueue(int sig, struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *t,
-		struct sigpending *pending)
+				struct sigpending *pending)
 {
+	handle_stop_signal(sig, t);
+
 	if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
 		/*
 		 * If an SI_TIMER entry is already queue just increment
@@ -1335,7 +1337,6 @@ send_group_sigqueue(int sig, struct sigq
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	/* Since it_lock is held, p->sighand cannot be NULL. */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
-	handle_stop_signal(sig, p);
 
 	ret = do_send_sigqueue(sig, q, p, &p->signal->shared_pending);
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/