Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc4

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Mar 07 2008 - 04:04:27 EST



* Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > no luck - a few hundred successful randconfig bootups overnight
> > (with a rather complex userspace startup to full X plus networking,
> > and the testbox is used via the network to compile the next random
> > kernel as well - etc.) and no failure at all. So there's not much we
> > can do at this point - i'll keep you updated if anything new happens
> > in the tests.
>
> OK, so it could possibly be something else or perhaps something that's
> existed for a long time.
>
> To capture vital debugging information for cases like this, I had an
> idea for a sysrq key that would dump queue and io scheduler info for
> all known block devices. That should help pin point where the problem
> lies. If we have any letters left in the sysrq namespace :-)

btw., we should reserve one sysrq letter as a "meta" character. If that
letter is 'X' [for Xtended SysRq] then SysRq-X SysRq-B could dump the
block info.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/