Re: [PATCH] 4/4 i_mmap_lock spinlock2rwsem (#v9 was 1/4)

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> I didn't look into this but it shows how it would be risky to make
> this change in .25. It's a bit strange that the bugcheck triggers

Yes this was never intended for .25. I think we need to split this into a 
copule of patches. One needs to get rid of the spinlock dropping, then one 
that deals with the read concurrency issues and finally one that converts 
the spinlock. Thanks for looking at it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/