Re: [PATCH] x86: Change x86 to use generic find_next_bit

From: Alexander van Heukelum
Date: Sun Mar 09 2008 - 17:14:00 EST


On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:10:16 +0100, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@xxxxxxx> said:
> > Athlon Xeon Opteron 32/64bit
> > x86-specific: 0m3.692s 0m2.820s 0m3.196s / 0m2.480s
> > generic: 0m2.622s 0m1.662s 0m2.100s / 0m1.572s
>
> ok, that's rather convincing.
>
> the generic version in lib/find_next_bit.c is open-coded C which gcc can
> optimize pretty nicely.
>
> the hand-coded assembly versions in arch/x86/lib/bitops_32.c mostly use
> the special x86 'bit search forward' (BSF) instruction - which i know
> from the days when the scheduler relied on it has some non-trivial setup
> costs. So especially when there's _small_ bitmasks involved, it's more
> expensive.

Hi,

BSF is fine, it doesn't need any special setup. The problem is probably
that the old versions use find_first_bit and find_first_zero_bit,
which are also hand optimized versions... and they use "repe scasl/q".
That's another little project ;).

> > If the bitmap size is not a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG, and no set
> > (cleared) bit is found, find_next_bit (find_next_zero_bit) returns a
> > value outside of the range [0,size]. The generic version always
> > returns exactly size. The generic version also uses unsigned long
> > everywhere, while the x86 versions use a mishmash of int, unsigned
> > (int), long and unsigned long.
>
> i'm not surprised that the hand-coded assembly versions had a bug ...

Not surprised about the bug, but it was in fact noticed, and fixed
in x86_64!

> [ this means we have to test it quite carefully though, as lots of code
> only ever gets tested on x86 so code could have built dependency on
> the buggy behavior. ]

Agreed.

> > Using the generic version does give a slightly bigger kernel, though.
> >
> > defconfig: text data bss dec hex filename
> > x86-specific: 4738555 481232 626688 5846475 5935cb vmlinux (32 bit)
> > generic: 4738621 481232 626688 5846541 59360d vmlinux (32 bit)
> > x86-specific: 5392395 846568 724424 6963387 6a40bb vmlinux (64 bit)
> > generic: 5392458 846568 724424 6963450 6a40fa vmlinux (64 bit)
>
> i'd not worry about that too much. Have you tried to build with:

I don't but I needed to compile something to test the build anyhow ;)

> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y
> CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y

This was defconfig in -x86#testing, they were both already enabled.
Here is what you get with those options turned off ;).

text data bss dec hex filename
x86-specific: 5543996 481232 626688 6651916 65800c vmlinux (32 bit)
generic: 5543880 481232 626688 6651800 657f98 vmlinux (32 bit)
x86-specific: 6111834 846568 724424 7682826 753b0a vmlinux (64 bit)
generic: 6111882 846568 724424 7682874 753b3a vmlinux (64 bit)

(and I double-checked the i386 results)

> (the latter only available in x86.git)
>
> > Patch is against -x86#testing. It compiles.
>
> i've picked it up into x86.git, lets see how it goes in practice.

Thanks,
Alexander

> Ingo
--
Alexander van Heukelum
heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx

--
http://www.fastmail.fm - And now for something completely different?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/