Re: [PATCH] sched: fix race in schedule

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 23:47 +0100, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> On 14/03/2008, Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> >  >> But maybe there is something esle that would be exposed by the
> >  >> 'rq->curr = rq->idle' manipulation... I can't provide examples right
> >  >> now though (I need to think on it).
> >  >
> >  > I share your concerns, I don't really like it either. Just spewing out
> >  > ideas here - bad ideas it seems :-/
> >  >
> >  > Ingo also suggested moving the balance calls right before
> >  > deactivate_task(), but that gives a whole other set of head-aches.
> >  >
> >
> >
> > Well, what will we do about this issue?
> >  I see you're thinking to fix inconsistency in scheduler, right?
> >  I agree about it.
> >
> >  However, I don't think it's good to remain this issue long time in
> >  the -stable kernel.
> >
> >  Could you please let me know what I can do?
> 
> IMHO, the safest solution for the time being (and esp. for -stable)
> would be to proceed with Hiroshi's patch. It looks safe and it does
> fix a real problem.

Agreed

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/