Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet

[Daniel Phillips]

On Saturday 15 March 2008 22:42, David Newall wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > That is why I keep recommending that a ramback setup be replicated or
> > mirrored, which people in this thread keep glossing over.  When
> > replicated or mirrored, you still get the microsecond-level transaction
> > times, and you get the safety too.
> 
> Do you mean it should be replicated with a second ramback?  That would
> be pretty pointless, since all failure modes would affect both.  It's
> not like one ramback will survive a crash when the other doesn't.

A second machine running a second ramback, on a second UPS pair.
I thought that was obvious.

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/