Re: BUG: drop_pagecache_sb vs kjournald lockup

From: Jan Kara
Date: Tue Mar 18 2008 - 09:43:47 EST


> 2.6.25-rc3, 4p ia64, ext3 root drive.
>
> I was running an XFS stress test on one of the XFS partitions on
> the machine (zero load on the root ext3 drive), when the system
> locked up in kjournald with this on the console:
>
> BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#2, kjournald/2150, a000000100e022e0
>
<snip traces>

> Looks like everything is backed up on the inode_lock. Why? Looks
> like drop_pagecache_sb() is doing something ..... suboptimal.
>
> static void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> struct inode *inode;
>
> spin_lock(&inode_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
> if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE))
> continue;
> __invalidate_mapping_pages(inode->i_mapping, 0, -1, true);
> }
> spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
> }
>
> It holds the inode_lock for an amazingly long time, and calls a
> function that ends up in ->release_page which can issue
> transactions.
>
> Given that transactions can then mark an inode dirty or the
> kjournald might need to mark an inode dirty while holding
> transaction locks, the implementation of drop_pagecache_sb seems to
> be just a little dangerous....
>
> Anyone know the reason why drop_pagecache_sb() uses such a brute-force
> mechanism to free up clean page cache pages?
Yes, we know that drop_pagecache_sb() has locking issues but since it
is intended to be used for debugging purposes only, nobody cared enough
to fix it. Completely untested patch below if you dare to try ;)

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SuSE CR Labs
---

From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:38:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix drop_pagecache_sb() to not call __invalidate_mapping_pages() under
inode_lock.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/drop_caches.c | 8 +++++++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/drop_caches.c b/fs/drop_caches.c
index 59375ef..f5aae26 100644
--- a/fs/drop_caches.c
+++ b/fs/drop_caches.c
@@ -14,15 +14,21 @@ int sysctl_drop_caches;

static void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
{
- struct inode *inode;
+ struct inode *inode, *toput_inode = NULL;

spin_lock(&inode_lock);
list_for_each_entry(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE))
continue;
+ __iget(inode);
+ spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
__invalidate_mapping_pages(inode->i_mapping, 0, -1, true);
+ iput(toput_inode);
+ toput_inode = inode;
+ spin_lock(&inode_lock);
}
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
+ iput(toput_inode);
}

void drop_pagecache(void)
--
1.5.2.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/