Re: [PATCH/RFC] introduce ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS Kconfig symbol

[Will Newton]

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  +For some ethernet hardware that cannot DMA to unaligned addresses like
>  +4*n+2 or non-ethernet hardware, this can be a problem, and it is then
>  +required to copy the incoming frame into an aligned buffer. Because this is
>  +unnecessary on architectures that can do unaligned accesses, the code can be
>  +made depend on CONFIG_ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS like so:
>  +
>  +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
>  +       skb = copy skb
>  +#else
>  +       skb = original skb
>  +#endif

Is this logic reversed?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/