Re: [PATCH 1/7] LinuxPPS core support.

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Mar 20 2008 - 16:06:02 EST


On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:09:00 +0100
Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +pps_core-y := pps.o kapi.o sysfs.o

Does it compile OK with CONFIG_SYSFS=n?

> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/time.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/idr.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/pps.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Global variables
> + */
> +
> +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(idr_lock);

This name is insufficiently specific. Not only does it risk linkage
errors, it makes it ahrd for poeple to work out where the symbol came from.

I renamed it to pps_idr_lock.

> +DEFINE_IDR(pps_idr);
>
> ...
>
> +void pps_unregister_source(int source)
> +{
> + struct pps_device *pps;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&idr_lock);
> + pps = idr_find(&pps_idr, source);
> +
> + if (!pps) {
> + spin_unlock_irq(&idr_lock);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* This should be done first in order to deny IRQ handlers
> + * to access PPS structs
> + */
> +
> + idr_remove(&pps_idr, pps->id);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&idr_lock);
> +
> + wait_event(pps->usage_queue, atomic_read(&pps->usage) == 0);
> +
> + pps_sysfs_remove_source_entry(pps);
> + pps_unregister_cdev(pps);
> + kfree(pps);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pps_unregister_source);

The wait_event() stuff really shouldn't be here: it should be integral to
the refcounting:

void pps_dev_put(struct pps_device *pps)
{
spin_lock_irq(&pps_lock);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&pps->usage))
idr_remove(&pps_idr, pps->id);
else
pps = NULL;
spin_unlock_irq(&pps_lock);
if (pps) {
/*
* Might need to do the below via schedule_work() if
* pps_dev_put() is to be callable from atomic context
*/
pps_sysfs_remove_source_entry(pps);
pps_unregister_cdev(pps);
kfree(pps);
}
}

As it stands, there might be deadlocks such as when a process which itself
holds a ref on the pps_device (with an open fd?) calls
pps_unregister_source.

Also, we need to take care that all processes which were waiting in
pps_unregister_source() get to finish their cleanup before we permit rmmod
to proceed. Is that handled somewhere?

> +void pps_event(int source, int event, void *data)

Please document the API in the kernel source. I realise there's a teeny
bit of documentation in pps.txt, but people don't think to look there and
it tends to go out of date.

It doesn't have to be fancy formal kerneldoc - it's better to add *good*
comments which tell people what they need to know. For some reason people
seem to add useless obvious stuff when they do their comments in kerneldoc
form.

> +{
> + struct pps_device *pps;
> + struct timespec __ts;
> + struct pps_ktime ts;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + /* First of all we get the time stamp... */
> + getnstimeofday(&__ts);
> +
> + /* ... and translate it to PPS time data struct */
> + ts.sec = __ts.tv_sec;
> + ts.nsec = __ts.tv_nsec;
> +
> + if ((event & (PPS_CAPTUREASSERT | PPS_CAPTURECLEAR)) == 0) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "pps: unknown event (%x) for source %d\n",
> + event, source);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&idr_lock, flags);
> + pps = idr_find(&pps_idr, source);
> +
> + /* If we find a valid PPS source we lock it before leaving
> + * the lock!
> + */
> + if (pps)
> + atomic_inc(&pps->usage);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&idr_lock, flags);

The above pattern is repeated rather a lot and could perhaps be extracted
into a nice pps_dev_get() helper.

> + if (!pps)
> + return;
> +
> + pr_debug("PPS event on source %d at %llu.%06u\n",
> + pps->id, ts.sec, ts.nsec);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pps->lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Must call the echo function? */
> + if ((pps->params.mode & (PPS_ECHOASSERT | PPS_ECHOCLEAR)))
> + pps->info.echo(source, event, data);
> +
> + /* Check the event */
> + pps->current_mode = pps->params.mode;
> + if (event & PPS_CAPTUREASSERT) {
> + /* We have to add an offset? */
> + if (pps->params.mode & PPS_OFFSETASSERT)
> + pps_add_offset(&ts, &pps->params.assert_off_tu);
> +
> + /* Save the time stamp */
> + pps->assert_tu = ts;
> + pps->assert_sequence++;
> + pr_debug("capture assert seq #%u for source %d\n",
> + pps->assert_sequence, source);
> + }
> + if (event & PPS_CAPTURECLEAR) {
> + /* We have to add an offset? */
> + if (pps->params.mode & PPS_OFFSETCLEAR)
> + pps_add_offset(&ts, &pps->params.clear_off_tu);
> +
> + /* Save the time stamp */
> + pps->clear_tu = ts;
> + pps->clear_sequence++;
> + pr_debug("capture clear seq #%u for source %d\n",
> + pps->clear_sequence, source);
> + }
> +
> + pps->go = ~0;
> + wake_up_interruptible(&pps->queue);
> +
> + kill_fasync(&pps->async_queue, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pps->lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Now we can release the PPS source for (possible) deregistration */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&idr_lock, flags);
> + atomic_dec(&pps->usage);
> + wake_up_all(&pps->usage_queue);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&idr_lock, flags);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pps_event);
>
> ...
>
> +static int pps_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct pps_device *pps = container_of(inode->i_cdev,
> + struct pps_device, cdev);
> + int found;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&idr_lock);
> + found = idr_find(&pps_idr, pps->id) != NULL;
> +
> + /* Lock the PPS source against (possible) deregistration */
> + if (found)
> + atomic_inc(&pps->usage);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irq(&idr_lock);

That looks a bit odd. How can the pps_device not be registered in the IDR
tree at this stage?


> + if (!found)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + file->private_data = pps;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> ...
>
> +/* Kernel consumers */
> +#define PPS_KC_HARDPPS 0 /* hardpps() (or equivalent) */
> +#define PPS_KC_HARDPPS_PLL 1 /* hardpps() constrained to
> + use a phase-locked loop */
> +#define PPS_KC_HARDPPS_FLL 2 /* hardpps() constrained to
> + use a frequency-locked loop */
> +/*
> + * Here begins the implementation-specific part!
> + */
> +
> +struct pps_fdata {
> + struct pps_kinfo info;
> + struct pps_ktime timeout;
> +};
> +
> +#include <linux/ioctl.h>
> +
> +#define PPS_CHECK _IO('P', 0)
> +#define PPS_GETPARAMS _IOR('P', 1, struct pps_kparams *)
> +#define PPS_SETPARAMS _IOW('P', 2, struct pps_kparams *)
> +#define PPS_GETCAP _IOR('P', 3, int *)
> +#define PPS_FETCH _IOWR('P', 4, struct pps_fdata *)
> +
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> +
> +#include <linux/cdev.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +
> +#define PPS_VERSION "5.0.0"
> +#define PPS_MAX_SOURCES 16 /* should be enough... */

It's nice to avoid sprinkling #includes throughout the file, please.
People expect to be able to see what's being included in the first
screenful of the file.

> +/*
> + * Global defines
> + */
> +
> +/* The specific PPS source info */
> +struct pps_source_info {
> + char name[PPS_MAX_NAME_LEN]; /* simbolic name */
> + char path[PPS_MAX_NAME_LEN]; /* path of connected device */
> + int mode; /* PPS's allowed mode */
> +
> + void (*echo)(int source, int event, void *data); /* PPS echo function */
> +
> + struct module *owner;
> + struct device *dev;
> +};
> +

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/