Re: [PATCH] bonding: Fix sysfs attribute handling

From: Jay Vosburgh
Date: Sat Mar 22 2008 - 21:12:52 EST


Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:52:55 +0100 Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> bonding: Fix sysfs attribute handling
>>
>> For bonding interfaces any attempt to read the sysfs directory contents after
>> module removal results in an oops. The fix is to release sysfs attributes
>> for the interfaces upon module unload.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@xxxxxxx>
>> --
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 3 +--
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> index 0942d82..33767d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> @@ -4528,8 +4528,7 @@ static void bond_free_all(void)
>> netif_tx_unlock_bh(bond_dev);
>> /* Release the bonded slaves */
>> bond_release_all(bond_dev);
>> - bond_deinit(bond_dev);
>> - unregister_netdevice(bond_dev);
>> + bond_destroy(bond);
>> }
>
>Is this also needed in 2.6.24.x?

Yes (I haven't tested it personally, but the affected code is
the same). I was going to forward this to stable when it was accepted
upstream. The oops is fairly straightforward to create:

# modprobe bonding
# cd /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding
# rmmod bonding
# ls

-J

---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@xxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/