Re: [PATCH] Improvev netconsole support for RTL8139 NIC driver

[Jeff Garzik]

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I am being realistic...  it's
>
> * not needed
> * increases code size
> * increases number of CPU instructions executed
> * not needed

I also wonder if using spin_lock_irqsave() makes moving to a real-time 
kernel with interrupt threads more difficult for that driver.

And of course we're talking about a hot path here.

	Jeff


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/