Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)

[Artem Bityutskiy]

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> > > For me, the motivators to wait for LogFS are mainly the facts that it
> > > can work on traditional block devices, and not only on pure flash:
> > Sorry Thomasz, for me this makes zero sense. There are _much_ better file
> > systems for block devices.
>
> I think he refers to flash disks appearing as block devices, like
> usb sticks or similar.

Right, I also meant that in my opinion it makes more sense to use traditional
file-systems like ext3 on USB-key/MMC and the like stuff (which I confusingly
referred as "block devices"), or may be something more "heavy-weight" like
XFS or JFS (never tried them, though).

--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (ÐÑÑÑÐ ÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐ)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/