[PATCH 13/14] Unionfs: don't purge lower sb data on remount

From: Erez Zadok
Date: Tue Apr 01 2008 - 17:12:15 EST


This is no longer needed, as we don't have upper and lower pages. Plus this
was racy, requiring the unexported inode_lock variable.

Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/unionfs/dentry.c | 11 -----------
fs/unionfs/super.c | 8 +++++---
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
index 5e498c2..ee0da4f 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
@@ -273,17 +273,6 @@ static inline void purge_inode_data(struct inode *inode)
*/
}

-void purge_sb_data(struct super_block *sb)
-{
- struct inode *inode;
-
- list_for_each_entry(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
- if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE))
- continue;
- purge_inode_data(inode);
- }
-}
-
/*
* Revalidate a single file/symlink/special dentry. Assume that info nodes
* of the dentry and its parent are locked. Assume that parent(s) are all
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/super.c b/fs/unionfs/super.c
index 4cddc83..82b4045 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/super.c
@@ -747,10 +747,12 @@ out_no_change:
* function). This revalidation will happen lazily and
* incrementally, as users perform operations on cached inodes. We
* would like to encourage this revalidation to happen sooner if
- * possible, so we try to invalidate as many other pages in our
- * superblock as we can.
+ * possible, so we like to try to invalidate as many other pages in
+ * our superblock as we can. We used to call drop_pagecache_sb() or
+ * a variant thereof, but either method was racy (drop_caches alone
+ * is known to be racy). So now we let the revalidation happen on a
+ * per file basis in ->d_revalidate.
*/
- purge_sb_data(sb);

/* grab new lower super references; release old ones */
for (i = 0; i < new_branches; i++)
--
1.5.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/