Re: GFP_ATOMIC page allocation failures.

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

Hi

CC'ed  netdev

> The appropriate thing to do here is to convert known-good drivers (such as
> e1000[e]) to use __GFP_NOWARN.
> 
> Unfortunately netdev_alloc_skb() went and assumed GFP_ATOMIC, but I guess
> we can dive below the covers and use __netdev_alloc_skb():

if network guys hope known-good driver should call 
__netdev_alloc_skb(dev, length, GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_NOWARN) instead netdev_alloc_skb,
I think we should make netdev_alloc_skb_nowarn.

static inline void *netdev_alloc_skb_nowarn(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int length)
{
	return __netdev_alloc_skb(dev, length, GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_NOWARN);
}


if not, we make unnecessary various alloc_skb
(e.g. e1000_alloc_skb, tg3_alloc_skb, 3com_alloc_skb etc..)


> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> We get rather a lot of reports of page allocation warnings coming out of
> e1000.  But this driver is know to handle them properly so let's suppress
> them.
> 
> Cc: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h      |    4 ++++
>  drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c |   10 +++++-----
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c~e1000-suppress-page-allocation-failure-warnings drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c~e1000-suppress-page-allocation-failure-warnings
> +++ a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> @@ -4296,7 +4296,7 @@ e1000_clean_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter 
>  		 * of reassembly being done in the stack */
>  		if (length < copybreak) {
>  			struct sk_buff *new_skb =
> -			    netdev_alloc_skb(netdev, length + NET_IP_ALIGN);
> +			    e1000_alloc_skb(netdev, length + NET_IP_ALIGN);
>  			if (new_skb) {
>  				skb_reserve(new_skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
>  				skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb,
> @@ -4585,7 +4585,7 @@ e1000_alloc_rx_buffers(struct e1000_adap
>  			goto map_skb;
>  		}
>  
> -		skb = netdev_alloc_skb(netdev, bufsz);
> +		skb = e1000_alloc_skb(netdev, bufsz);
>  		if (unlikely(!skb)) {
>  			/* Better luck next round */
>  			adapter->alloc_rx_buff_failed++;
> @@ -4598,7 +4598,7 @@ e1000_alloc_rx_buffers(struct e1000_adap
>  			DPRINTK(RX_ERR, ERR, "skb align check failed: %u bytes "
>  					     "at %p\n", bufsz, skb->data);
>  			/* Try again, without freeing the previous */
> -			skb = netdev_alloc_skb(netdev, bufsz);
> +			skb = e1000_alloc_skb(netdev, bufsz);
>  			/* Failed allocation, critical failure */
>  			if (!skb) {
>  				dev_kfree_skb(oldskb);
> @@ -4720,8 +4720,8 @@ e1000_alloc_rx_buffers_ps(struct e1000_a
>  				rx_desc->read.buffer_addr[j+1] = ~cpu_to_le64(0);
>  		}
>  
> -		skb = netdev_alloc_skb(netdev,
> -		                       adapter->rx_ps_bsize0 + NET_IP_ALIGN);
> +		skb = e1000_alloc_skb(netdev,
> +					adapter->rx_ps_bsize0 + NET_IP_ALIGN);
>  
>  		if (unlikely(!skb)) {
>  			adapter->alloc_rx_buff_failed++;
> diff -puN drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h~e1000-suppress-page-allocation-failure-warnings drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h~e1000-suppress-page-allocation-failure-warnings
> +++ a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h
> @@ -358,5 +358,9 @@ extern void e1000_power_up_phy(struct e1
>  extern void e1000_set_ethtool_ops(struct net_device *netdev);
>  extern void e1000_check_options(struct e1000_adapter *adapter);
>  
> +static inline void *e1000_alloc_skb(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int length)
> +{
> +	return __netdev_alloc_skb(dev, length, GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_NOWARN);
> +}
>  
>  #endif /* _E1000_H_ */
> _


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/