Re: cgroup_disable=memory for 2.6.25?

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:41:53 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:57:14 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I expected those patches to make it into 2.6.25.
> 
> My mind-ray receptors might need a tune-up.
> 
> > Could we please push these patches upstream before 2.6.25? Or is it too late?
> 
> Should be OK.  I borrowed a bit of Hugh's email and stuck it in the changelog
> so that it at least has some attempt to describe why it's an urgent change.

For example. Unix bench's execl test result on x86_64 was

== just after boot without mounting any cgroup fs.==
mem_cgorup=off : Execl Throughput       43.0     3150.1      732.6
mem_cgroup=on  : Execl Throughput       43.0     2932.6      682.0
==

I believe this is worth ot be urgent.

I'm now trying performance improvement patches but it's too late.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/