Re: 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs.smc::kbd_backlight ?

From: Soeren Sonnenburg
Date: Fri Apr 04 2008 - 02:54:47 EST


On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 20:58 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am wondering whether the change from
>
> /sys/devices/platform/applesmc.768/leds/smc:kbd_backlight (2.6.24)
> /sys/devices/platform/applesmc.768/leds/smc::kbd_backlight (2.6.25)
>
> is intentional?
>
> I recognized that it breaks current userspace applications changing the
> keyboard background leds like pommed...

OK it looks like commit 6c152beefbf90579d21afc4f7e075b1f801f9a75 from
Richard Purdie, 'leds: Standardise LED naming scheme' introduced this
change.

Why do we need '::' instead of a single ':' (that would not have broken
things)?

Also sometimes only a single ':' seperator is used like in
corgi:green:mail but e.g. not in clevo::mail ?!

Soeren
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/