Re: User space automounter problems after upgrade to 2.6.25-rc9

From: Martin Knoblauch
Date: Tue Apr 15 2008 - 09:58:22 EST


----- Original Message ----
> From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; am-utils <am-utils@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 2:57:26 PM
> Subject: Re: User space automounter problems after upgrade to 2.6.25-rc9
>
>
> On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 04:28 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after booting a newly built 2.6.25-rc9 kernel, I see the following messages
> and the user space automounter fails to work. Last good kernel for me is 2.6.24,
> as -rc9 is my first attempt at 2.6.25. Extremely sorry for being late to the
> game :-(
> >
> > [ 13.776876] Invalid hostname "pid4302@lpsdm60:/home" in NFS lock request
> > [ 11.996757] Invalid hostname "pid4302@lpsdm60:/home" in NFS lock request
> > [ 14.504927] Invalid hostname "pid4302@lpsdm60:/home" in NFS lock request
> > [ 13.636860] Invalid hostname "pid4302@lpsdm60:/home" in NFS lock request
> > [ 14.504927] Invalid hostname "pid4302@lpsdm60:/home" in NFS lock request
> > [ 13.636860] Invalid hostname "pid4302@lpsdm60:/home" in NFS lock request
> > [ 14.505079] Invalid hostname "pid4302@lpsdm60:/home" in NFS lock request
> > [ 11.996757] Invalid hostname "pid4302@lpsdm60:/home" in NFS lock request
> > [ 13.636860] Invalid hostname "pid4302@lpsdm60:/home" in NFS lock request
> > [ 12.688801] Invalid hostname "pid4302@lpsdm60:/soft" in NFS lock request
> >
> > am-utils version is 6.1.5, config is attached
>
> Already reported in:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10349
> and
> https://bugzilla.am-utils.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612
>
> The problem is due to known bugs in the am-utils mount code (no,
> 'pid4302@lpsdm60:/soft' is not and has never been a valid server
> hostname).
>

I always wondered, but never asked :-) Apparently the kernel did never care until recently.

> The workaround should be to turn off locking by adding the 'nolock'
> mount flag.
>

Not sure what kind of side effects that will have. Probably better to stay at 2.6.24 and wait for a fix in am-utils.

Cheers

Martin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/