Re: [PATCH] x86: fix find_next_bit breakage on ppc and powerpc

From: Alexander van Heukelum
Date: Wed Apr 16 2008 - 11:03:31 EST



On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:40:51 +0200, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@xxxxxxx> said:
>
> * Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Powerpc (and ppc) have their have some code in their bitops.h which
> > used to be exacly the same as asm-generic/bitops/find.h. Include this
> > header instead.
> >
> > This should also fix the compile problems due to the generic
> > find_next_bit changes. Those were fixed by Thomas Gleixner in
> > asm-generic/bitops/find.h earlier.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> thanks, applied. I dropped:
>
> Subject: powerpc: fix powerpc build
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> and i'm keeping:
>
> Subject: generic: find_next_bit() fix
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> should i also drop:
>
> Subject: find_first_bit() ppc fix
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ?

Yes, that problem should be fixed by my patch.

Thanks,
Alexander

> Ingo
--
Alexander van Heukelum
heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx

--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Does exactly what it says on the tin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/