Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: fix text_poke

[Andi Kleen]

> I suspect I should have just kept using vmap(), even if I do dislike just 
> how insanely expensive that likely is.

If it's really a problem it would be better to just batch it and extract
it into a separate function. The larger scale callers of text_poke() are 
loops, so you could just map it once before the loop and then unmap after. 
But I haven't heard about anyone complaining about this.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/