Re: [PATCH] disable softlockup detection at boottime

[Ingo Molnar]

* Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 06:55:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > good idea - but why dont you set softlockup_thresh to 0, which is the 
> > "off" switch already? (and that way it can be turned back on later as 
> > well, by the sysadmin.)
> > 
> 
> I'm getting unaligned access errors trying to set it to anything, so 
> it's not working for me currently (2.6.25):
> 
> It's tripping up on the address of 'one', which is an int that is not 
> properly aligned for the unsigned long comparison in 
> proc_doulongvec_minmax on my 64 bit machine.  Also, the value '0' is 
> invalid for softlockup_thresh, correct?
> 
> I temporarily got around these issues with the following hack.

ah, sorry. But ... perhaps using threshold -1 would be the most 
intuitive setting? (for 'infinite timeout' ==> softlockup detector 
turned off) That way it all becomes configurable as part of the 
threshold? No strong opinion though.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/