[PATCH] m68knommu: fix FEC driver locking

From: Greg Ungerer
Date: Thu May 01 2008 - 00:09:24 EST


From: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

It's easy: grab locks before talking to hardware and realease
them afterwards. The one big lock has been splitted into a hw_lock
and mii_lock.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---


diff -Naurp linux-2.6.25/drivers/net/fec.c linux-2.6.25-uc0/drivers/net/fec.c
--- linux-2.6.25/drivers/net/fec.c 2008-04-17 12:49:44.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6.25-uc0/drivers/net/fec.c 2008-04-30 13:39:06.000000000 +1000
@@ -209,7 +209,10 @@ struct fec_enet_private {
cbd_t *cur_rx, *cur_tx; /* The next free ring entry */
cbd_t *dirty_tx; /* The ring entries to be free()ed. */
uint tx_full;
- spinlock_t lock;
+ /* hold while accessing the HW like ringbuffer for tx/rx but not MAC */
+ spinlock_t hw_lock;
+ /* hold while accessing the mii_list_t() elements */
+ spinlock_t mii_lock;

uint phy_id;
uint phy_id_done;
@@ -313,6 +316,7 @@ fec_enet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
volatile fec_t *fecp;
volatile cbd_t *bdp;
unsigned short status;
+ unsigned long flags;

fep = netdev_priv(dev);
fecp = (volatile fec_t*)dev->base_addr;
@@ -322,6 +326,7 @@ fec_enet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
return 1;
}

+ spin_lock_irqsave(&fep->hw_lock, flags);
/* Fill in a Tx ring entry */
bdp = fep->cur_tx;

@@ -332,6 +337,7 @@ fec_enet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
* This should not happen, since dev->tbusy should be set.
*/
printk("%s: tx queue full!.\n", dev->name);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fep->hw_lock, flags);
return 1;
}
#endif
@@ -370,8 +376,6 @@ fec_enet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
flush_dcache_range((unsigned long)skb->data,
(unsigned long)skb->data + skb->len);

- spin_lock_irq(&fep->lock);
-
/* Send it on its way. Tell FEC it's ready, interrupt when done,
* it's the last BD of the frame, and to put the CRC on the end.
*/
@@ -400,7 +404,7 @@ fec_enet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,

fep->cur_tx = (cbd_t *)bdp;

- spin_unlock_irq(&fep->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fep->hw_lock, flags);

return 0;
}
@@ -458,19 +462,20 @@ fec_enet_interrupt(int irq, void * dev_i
struct net_device *dev = dev_id;
volatile fec_t *fecp;
uint int_events;
- int handled = 0;
+ irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;

fecp = (volatile fec_t*)dev->base_addr;

/* Get the interrupt events that caused us to be here.
*/
- while ((int_events = fecp->fec_ievent) != 0) {
+ do {
+ int_events = fecp->fec_ievent;
fecp->fec_ievent = int_events;

/* Handle receive event in its own function.
*/
if (int_events & FEC_ENET_RXF) {
- handled = 1;
+ ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
fec_enet_rx(dev);
}

@@ -479,17 +484,18 @@ fec_enet_interrupt(int irq, void * dev_i
them as part of the transmit process.
*/
if (int_events & FEC_ENET_TXF) {
- handled = 1;
+ ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
fec_enet_tx(dev);
}

if (int_events & FEC_ENET_MII) {
- handled = 1;
+ ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
fec_enet_mii(dev);
}

- }
- return IRQ_RETVAL(handled);
+ } while (int_events);
+
+ return ret;
}


@@ -502,7 +508,7 @@ fec_enet_tx(struct net_device *dev)
struct sk_buff *skb;

fep = netdev_priv(dev);
- spin_lock(&fep->lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&fep->hw_lock);
bdp = fep->dirty_tx;

while (((status = bdp->cbd_sc) & BD_ENET_TX_READY) == 0) {
@@ -561,7 +567,7 @@ fec_enet_tx(struct net_device *dev)
}
}
fep->dirty_tx = (cbd_t *)bdp;
- spin_unlock(&fep->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&fep->hw_lock);
}


@@ -588,6 +594,8 @@ fec_enet_rx(struct net_device *dev)
fep = netdev_priv(dev);
fecp = (volatile fec_t*)dev->base_addr;

+ spin_lock_irq(&fep->hw_lock);
+
/* First, grab all of the stats for the incoming packet.
* These get messed up if we get called due to a busy condition.
*/
@@ -693,6 +701,8 @@ while (!((status = bdp->cbd_sc) & BD_ENE
*/
fecp->fec_r_des_active = 0;
#endif
+
+ spin_unlock_irq(&fep->hw_lock);
}


@@ -706,11 +716,11 @@ fec_enet_mii(struct net_device *dev)
uint mii_reg;

fep = netdev_priv(dev);
+ spin_lock_irq(&fep->mii_lock);
+
ep = fep->hwp;
mii_reg = ep->fec_mii_data;

- spin_lock(&fep->lock);
-
if ((mip = mii_head) == NULL) {
printk("MII and no head!\n");
goto unlock;
@@ -727,7 +737,7 @@ fec_enet_mii(struct net_device *dev)
ep->fec_mii_data = mip->mii_regval;

unlock:
- spin_unlock(&fep->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&fep->mii_lock);
}

static int
@@ -741,12 +751,11 @@ mii_queue(struct net_device *dev, int re
/* Add PHY address to register command.
*/
fep = netdev_priv(dev);
- regval |= fep->phy_addr << 23;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&fep->mii_lock, flags);

+ regval |= fep->phy_addr << 23;
retval = 0;

- spin_lock_irqsave(&fep->lock,flags);
-
if ((mip = mii_free) != NULL) {
mii_free = mip->mii_next;
mip->mii_regval = regval;
@@ -763,9 +772,8 @@ mii_queue(struct net_device *dev, int re
retval = 1;
}

- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fep->lock,flags);
-
- return(retval);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fep->mii_lock, flags);
+ return retval;
}

static void mii_do_cmd(struct net_device *dev, const phy_cmd_t *c)
@@ -2308,6 +2316,9 @@ int __init fec_enet_init(struct net_devi
return -ENOMEM;
}

+ spin_lock_init(&fep->hw_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&fep->mii_lock);
+
/* Create an Ethernet device instance.
*/
fecp = (volatile fec_t *) fec_hw[index];
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/