Re: [-mm][PATCH 3/4] Add rlimit controller accounting and control

From: Pavel Emelyanov
Date: Wed May 07 2008 - 02:06:24 EST


Paul Menage wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +
>> +int rlimit_cgroup_charge_as(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long nr_pages)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> + struct rlimit_cgroup *rcg;
>> +
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
>> + css_get(&rcg->css);
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> +
>> + ret = res_counter_charge(&rcg->as_res, (nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT));
>> + css_put(&rcg->css);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> You need to synchronize against mm->owner changing, or
> mm->owner->cgroups changing. How about:
>
> int rlimit_cgroup_charge_as(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> int ret;
> struct rlimit_cgroup *rcg;
> struct task_struct *owner;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> again:
>
> /* Find and lock the owner of the mm */
> owner = rcu_dereference(mm->owner);
> task_lock(owner);
> if (mm->owner != owner) {
> task_unlock(owner);
> goto again;
> }
>
> /* Charge the owner's cgroup with the new memory */
> rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_task(owner);
> ret = res_counter_charge(&rcg->as_res, (nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT));
> task_unlock(owner);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return ret;
> }
>
>> +
>> +void rlimit_cgroup_uncharge_as(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long nr_pages)
>> +{
>> + struct rlimit_cgroup *rcg;
>> +
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
>> + css_get(&rcg->css);
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> +
>> + res_counter_uncharge(&rcg->as_res, (nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT));
>> + css_put(&rcg->css);
>> +}
>
> Can't this be implemented as just a call to charge() with a negative
> value? (Possibly fixing res_counter_charge() to handle negative values
> if necessary) Seems simpler.

No, I'd keep two calls - charge and uncharge. This makes you sure that
the code xxx_charge(value) is a charge, regardless of what the "value"
is. Besides, xxx_charge returns an error code, you need to check (BTW, I
think we should add a __must_check attribute there), while uncharge does
not.

>> +/*
>> + * TODO: get the attach callbacks to fail and disallow task movement.
>> + */
>
> You mean disallow all movement within a hierarchy that has this cgroup
> mounted? Doesn't that make it rather hard to use?
>
>> +static void rlimit_cgroup_move_task(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
>> + struct cgroup *cgrp,
>> + struct cgroup *old_cgrp,
>> + struct task_struct *p)
>> +{
>> + struct mm_struct *mm;
>> + struct rlimit_cgroup *rcg, *old_rcg;
>> +
>> + mm = get_task_mm(p);
>> + if (mm == NULL)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + if (p != rcu_dereference(mm->owner))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_cgrp(cgrp);
>> + old_rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_cgrp(old_cgrp);
>> +
>> + if (rcg == old_rcg)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + if (res_counter_charge(&rcg->as_res, (mm->total_vm << PAGE_SHIFT)))
>> + goto out;
>> + res_counter_uncharge(&old_rcg->as_res, (mm->total_vm << PAGE_SHIFT));
>> +out:
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> + mmput(mm);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Since you need to protect against concurrent charges, and against
> concurrent mm ownership changes, I think you should just do this under
> task_lock(p).
>
>> +static void rlimit_cgroup_mm_owner_changed(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
>> + struct cgroup *cgrp,
>> + struct cgroup *old_cgrp,
>> + struct task_struct *p)
>> +{
>> + struct rlimit_cgroup *rcg, *old_rcg;
>> + struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(p);
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(!mm);
>> + rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_cgrp(cgrp);
>> + old_rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_cgrp(old_cgrp);
>> + if (res_counter_charge(&rcg->as_res, (mm->total_vm << PAGE_SHIFT)))
>> + goto out;
>> + res_counter_uncharge(&old_rcg->as_res, (mm->total_vm << PAGE_SHIFT));
>> +out:
>> + mmput(mm);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Also needs to task_lock(p) to prevent concurrent charges or cgroup
> reassignments?
>
> Paul
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/