Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next

From: Pierre Ossman
Date: Tue May 13 2008 - 06:48:21 EST


On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:00:52 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 08:36:15 +0200 Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The stuff I've pushed to Andrew has always been what I've been hoping
> > to merge in the next window, so it should just be a matter of renaming
> > the branch. There is a #next at the above URI now.
>
> I have added that for tomorrow, thanks.
>
> I noticed that that tree also has a for-linus branch. Would that be bug
> fixes and stuff lined up for this release i.e. 2.6.26? If so, I could
> add that to linux-next as well as one of the early merge trees.
>

That's correct. But I've always made sure that for-linus is the base for
for-andrew (now next), so that should not be necessary.

--
-- Pierre Ossman

Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/